15th Speech in Noise Workshop, 11-12 January 2024, Potsdam, Germany 15th Speech in Noise Workshop, 11-12 January 2024, Potsdam, Germany

P37Session 1 (Thursday 11 January 2024, 15:35-18:00)
Temporal processing of slow amplitude modulations and consonant in noise perception in children using cochlear implants

Elodie Zuccarelli , Charlotte Benoit
Universite Paris Cité, Paris, France
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

Léo Varnet
Laboratoire des Systèmes perceptifs, Paris, France
CNRS, Paris, France
Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France

Christian Lorenzi
Laboratoire des Systèmes perceptifs, Paris, France
Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France

Laurianne Cabrera
Integrative Neurosciences and Cognition Center, Paris, France
CNRS, Paris, France
Université Paris Cité, Paris, France

The aim of this study was to evaluate the development of auditory temporal processing and speech in noise abilities in children using cochlear implants (CIs) in order to identify potential predictors of cochlear implantation success in childhood.

We included 25 children aged 5 to 12 years, implanted before the age of 4 years. They performed several psychophysical tasks measuring (1) AM detection thresholds for a slow modulation rate (8 Hz), (2) AM masking, (3) consonant identification thresholds in a stationary speech-shaped noise. The AM tasks were directly delivered through one electrode of the implant using a research interface provided by Advance Bionics (direct stimulation). Moreover, children with CIs completed standardized assessments of receptive vocabulary, communication skills, non-verbal reasoning, non-verbal working memory and the level of parental education was registered. Their perceptive thresholds were compared to two groups of children with normal-hearing (NH), matched either in chronological age, or in hearing age.

The results showed no effect of age on 8Hz-AM detection thresholds and children using CIs who were electrically stimulated showed better AM detection thresholds than acoustically stimulated children with NH. However, children using CIs showed significantly worse thresholds in the masking condition than children with NH. Children with CIs showed poorer consonant identification thresholds in noise compared to children with NH. Finally, regression analyses indicated that the only significant predictor of consonant identification in noise was parental education. No relationship between AM detection thresholds and consonant perception in noise was observed.

In conclusion, the processing of masked AM in children using CIs is not similar to their NH peers of the same chronological or hearing age. Their ability to identify consonants in stationary noise was impaired but not significantly related to AM processing at 8 Hz. Further studies are required to assess the value of other psychoacoustic tests that can be used clinically to better predict language learning in children using CIs.

Last modified 2024-01-16 10:49:05